Source-linked archive appendix
Certified-mail appendix
David D. Medeiros is a national advocate and voice for vulnerable populations, a documented state and federal whistleblower on Medicaid, federal funding, accessibility, accountability, and constitutional rights, and publisher of this source-linked public evidence archive.
This appendix maps existing public archive files. It does not turn a letter, submission, receipt, or request into an agency finding.
Sent is not received. Received is not read. Read is not investigated. Investigated is not a finding.

Read the evidence before drawing a conclusion
What does a receipt actually establish?
A letter, a mailing receipt, a portal confirmation and an agency decision answer different questions. Use this guide before reading the artifact table below.
- Prepared or sent
What was written or submitted? A letter records its author's words. A mailing receipt can document a mailing step.
Not established: who read it or what action followed.
- Received
What system or office acknowledged receipt? Match the date, recipient and identifier to the actual record.
Not established: personal review by the named official.
- Agency action recorded
What does a response or closure letter say the agency did? Preserve its stated scope and reasons.
Not established: an investigation or merits decision unless the source says so.
- Finding or outcome
Locate the actual decision before attributing a finding. Identify its issuer, date, scope and any later change.
If that record is absent: say the outcome is not established here.
These are separate evidence questions, not a claim that any case passed through every stage.
Follow one source without mixing different matters
The appendix already links these public files. Choose the document that answers your question; do not treat different receipt numbers as the same proceeding.
- Open the DOJ submission confirmation labeled 748277-JPJ (PDF) — examine the submission language and identifier, not an assumed agency finding.
- Open the HHS OCR complaint receipt labeled 675301 (PDF) — compare the receipt text with the appendix row; this is a separate identifier.
- Open the OCR CU-26-656216 closure letter (PDF) — read the actual scope and reasons before summarizing its effect.
Four checks before you cite a record
- Copy the exact record title or identifier, issuer and date shown. If a field is absent, say it is not shown.
- Read the surrounding passage. Separate the author's allegation from the receiving office's statement.
- Link the exact source file and identify the page or passage you used. A filename is not proof of its contents.
- State what remains unknown and look for a later source before calling an outcome current. A matching SHA-256 identifies matching bytes, not truth or legal authenticity.
Use the worked source-verification example · Read the archive's claim-control limits
Read one artifact at a time
Open a record below for a phone-friendly reading aid and a selectable citation to every artifact already linked in its appendix row. These are catalog-based aids, not new document findings, complete transcripts or current agency-status checks. Original files and the comparison table remain unchanged.
1. Joe Biden — President of the United States, The White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW
- Date shown in the existing appendix
- Sent 2024-09-25
- Recorded proof-class label
- sent; mail-room received
- Excerpt recorded in the appendix
- RECEIVED / MSOD Mail Operation
- Recorded tracking number
- 9589 0710 5270 1745 7374 94
Read and cite the linked artifacts
- USPS certified receipt photo = sent
- PS Form 3811 / MSOD stamp = mail-room received
- PS Form 3811 / MSOD stamp = mail-room received
What can this record answer?
Compare the source with the date, identifier and excerpt above. Identify whether the actual passage records correspondence, a mailing, an acknowledgment or a stated agency action. The catalog label alone does not establish what followed.
What would support a later status?
A later acknowledgment, response or decision must be matched to this same matter and identifier. Its own date, issuer and wording—not this archive row—determine what it records. No later outcome is established by this reading aid.
Follow the source-verification example · Separate a record from a finding
2. Kamala Harris — Vice President of the United States, The White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW
- Date shown in the existing appendix
- Sent 2024-09-25
- Recorded proof-class label
- sent; mail-room received
- Excerpt recorded in the appendix
- RECEIVED / MSOD Mail Operation
- Recorded tracking number
- 9589 0710 5270 1745 7374 87
Read and cite the linked artifacts
What can this record answer?
Compare the source with the date, identifier and excerpt above. Identify whether the actual passage records correspondence, a mailing, an acknowledgment or a stated agency action. The catalog label alone does not establish what followed.
What would support a later status?
A later acknowledgment, response or decision must be matched to this same matter and identifier. Its own date, issuer and wording—not this archive row—determine what it records. No later outcome is established by this reading aid.
Follow the source-verification example · Separate a record from a finding
3. Ned Lamont — Governor of Connecticut
- Date shown in the existing appendix
- 2023-11-28
- Recorded proof-class label
- PDF letter
- Excerpt recorded in the appendix
- “Dear Governor Lamont,”
- Recorded tracking number
- Not recorded in this appendix row
Read and cite the linked artifact
What can this record answer?
Compare the source with the date, identifier and excerpt above. Identify whether the actual passage records correspondence, a mailing, an acknowledgment or a stated agency action. The catalog label alone does not establish what followed.
What would support a later status?
A later acknowledgment, response or decision must be matched to this same matter and identifier. Its own date, issuer and wording—not this archive row—determine what it records. No later outcome is established by this reading aid.
Follow the source-verification example · Separate a record from a finding
4. Richard Blumenthal — U.S. Senator
- Date shown in the existing appendix
- 2023-11-28
- Recorded proof-class label
- PDF letter
- Excerpt recorded in the appendix
- “Dear Senator Blumenthal,”
- Recorded tracking number
- Not recorded in this appendix row
Read and cite the linked artifact
What can this record answer?
Compare the source with the date, identifier and excerpt above. Identify whether the actual passage records correspondence, a mailing, an acknowledgment or a stated agency action. The catalog label alone does not establish what followed.
What would support a later status?
A later acknowledgment, response or decision must be matched to this same matter and identifier. Its own date, issuer and wording—not this archive row—determine what it records. No later outcome is established by this reading aid.
Follow the source-verification example · Separate a record from a finding
5. Chris Murphy — U.S. Senator
- Date shown in the existing appendix
- 2023-11-28
- Recorded proof-class label
- PDF letter
- Excerpt recorded in the appendix
- “Dear Senator Murphy,”
- Recorded tracking number
- Not recorded in this appendix row
Read and cite the linked artifact
What can this record answer?
Compare the source with the date, identifier and excerpt above. Identify whether the actual passage records correspondence, a mailing, an acknowledgment or a stated agency action. The catalog label alone does not establish what followed.
What would support a later status?
A later acknowledgment, response or decision must be matched to this same matter and identifier. Its own date, issuer and wording—not this archive row—determine what it records. No later outcome is established by this reading aid.
Follow the source-verification example · Separate a record from a finding
6. John B. Larson — U.S. Representative
- Date shown in the existing appendix
- 2023-11-28
- Recorded proof-class label
- PDF letter
- Excerpt recorded in the appendix
- “Dear Congressman Larson,”
- Recorded tracking number
- Not recorded in this appendix row
Read and cite the linked artifact
What can this record answer?
Compare the source with the date, identifier and excerpt above. Identify whether the actual passage records correspondence, a mailing, an acknowledgment or a stated agency action. The catalog label alone does not establish what followed.
What would support a later status?
A later acknowledgment, response or decision must be matched to this same matter and identifier. Its own date, issuer and wording—not this archive row—determine what it records. No later outcome is established by this reading aid.
Follow the source-verification example · Separate a record from a finding
7. Joe Courtney — U.S. Representative
- Date shown in the existing appendix
- 2023-11-28
- Recorded proof-class label
- PDF letter
- Excerpt recorded in the appendix
- “Dear Congressman Courtney,”
- Recorded tracking number
- Not recorded in this appendix row
Read and cite the linked artifact
What can this record answer?
Compare the source with the date, identifier and excerpt above. Identify whether the actual passage records correspondence, a mailing, an acknowledgment or a stated agency action. The catalog label alone does not establish what followed.
What would support a later status?
A later acknowledgment, response or decision must be matched to this same matter and identifier. Its own date, issuer and wording—not this archive row—determine what it records. No later outcome is established by this reading aid.
Follow the source-verification example · Separate a record from a finding
8. Rosa DeLauro — U.S. Representative
- Date shown in the existing appendix
- 2023-11-28
- Recorded proof-class label
- PDF letter
- Excerpt recorded in the appendix
- “Dear Congresswoman DeLauro,”
- Recorded tracking number
- Not recorded in this appendix row
Read and cite the linked artifact
What can this record answer?
Compare the source with the date, identifier and excerpt above. Identify whether the actual passage records correspondence, a mailing, an acknowledgment or a stated agency action. The catalog label alone does not establish what followed.
What would support a later status?
A later acknowledgment, response or decision must be matched to this same matter and identifier. Its own date, issuer and wording—not this archive row—determine what it records. No later outcome is established by this reading aid.
Follow the source-verification example · Separate a record from a finding
9. Jim Himes — U.S. Representative
- Date shown in the existing appendix
- 2023-11-28
- Recorded proof-class label
- PDF letter
- Excerpt recorded in the appendix
- “Dear Congressman Himes,”
- Recorded tracking number
- Not recorded in this appendix row
Read and cite the linked artifact
What can this record answer?
Compare the source with the date, identifier and excerpt above. Identify whether the actual passage records correspondence, a mailing, an acknowledgment or a stated agency action. The catalog label alone does not establish what followed.
What would support a later status?
A later acknowledgment, response or decision must be matched to this same matter and identifier. Its own date, issuer and wording—not this archive row—determine what it records. No later outcome is established by this reading aid.
Follow the source-verification example · Separate a record from a finding
10. Jahana Hayes — U.S. Representative
- Date shown in the existing appendix
- 2023-11-28
- Recorded proof-class label
- PDF letter
- Excerpt recorded in the appendix
- “Dear Congresswoman Hayes,”
- Recorded tracking number
- Not recorded in this appendix row
Read and cite the linked artifact
What can this record answer?
Compare the source with the date, identifier and excerpt above. Identify whether the actual passage records correspondence, a mailing, an acknowledgment or a stated agency action. The catalog label alone does not establish what followed.
What would support a later status?
A later acknowledgment, response or decision must be matched to this same matter and identifier. Its own date, issuer and wording—not this archive row—determine what it records. No later outcome is established by this reading aid.
Follow the source-verification example · Separate a record from a finding
11. U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions
- Date shown in the existing appendix
- 2024-09-21 report; 2024-09-30 delivery card
- Recorded proof-class label
- USPS photo; signed green card; tracking number
- Excerpt recorded in the appendix
- “U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP)”
- Recorded tracking number
- 9590 9402 6262 0274 8430 42
Read and cite the linked artifact
What can this record answer?
Compare the source with the date, identifier and excerpt above. Identify whether the actual passage records correspondence, a mailing, an acknowledgment or a stated agency action. The catalog label alone does not establish what followed.
What would support a later status?
A later acknowledgment, response or decision must be matched to this same matter and identifier. Its own date, issuer and wording—not this archive row—determine what it records. No later outcome is established by this reading aid.
Follow the source-verification example · Separate a record from a finding
12. U.S. Department of Justice — Civil Rights Division (record 489456-MCB)
- Date shown in the existing appendix
- 2024-08-05
- Recorded proof-class label
- Portal email
- Excerpt recorded in the appendix
- “Thank you for submitting a report to the Civil Rights Division.”
- Recorded tracking number
- Not recorded in this appendix row
Read and cite the linked artifact
What can this record answer?
Compare the source with the date, identifier and excerpt above. Identify whether the actual passage records correspondence, a mailing, an acknowledgment or a stated agency action. The catalog label alone does not establish what followed.
What would support a later status?
A later acknowledgment, response or decision must be matched to this same matter and identifier. Its own date, issuer and wording—not this archive row—determine what it records. No later outcome is established by this reading aid.
Follow the source-verification example · Separate a record from a finding
13. U.S. Department of Justice — Civil Rights Division (record 533252-GXC)
- Date shown in the existing appendix
- 2024-11-09
- Recorded proof-class label
- Portal email
- Excerpt recorded in the appendix
- “Your record number is: 533252-GXC.”
- Recorded tracking number
- Not recorded in this appendix row
Read and cite the linked artifact
What can this record answer?
Compare the source with the date, identifier and excerpt above. Identify whether the actual passage records correspondence, a mailing, an acknowledgment or a stated agency action. The catalog label alone does not establish what followed.
What would support a later status?
A later acknowledgment, response or decision must be matched to this same matter and identifier. Its own date, issuer and wording—not this archive row—determine what it records. No later outcome is established by this reading aid.
Follow the source-verification example · Separate a record from a finding
14. U.S. Department of Justice — Civil Rights Division (record 548805-RXF)
- Date shown in the existing appendix
- 2024-12-19
- Recorded proof-class label
- Portal email
- Excerpt recorded in the appendix
- “Your record number is: 548805-RXF.”
- Recorded tracking number
- Not recorded in this appendix row
Read and cite the linked artifact
What can this record answer?
Compare the source with the date, identifier and excerpt above. Identify whether the actual passage records correspondence, a mailing, an acknowledgment or a stated agency action. The catalog label alone does not establish what followed.
What would support a later status?
A later acknowledgment, response or decision must be matched to this same matter and identifier. Its own date, issuer and wording—not this archive row—determine what it records. No later outcome is established by this reading aid.
Follow the source-verification example · Separate a record from a finding
15. U.S. Department of Justice — Civil Rights Division (record 748277-JPJ)
- Date shown in the existing appendix
- 2026-03-28
- Recorded proof-class label
- Portal email
- Excerpt recorded in the appendix
- “Report successfully submitted.”
- Recorded tracking number
- Not recorded in this appendix row
Read and cite the linked artifact
What can this record answer?
Compare the source with the date, identifier and excerpt above. Identify whether the actual passage records correspondence, a mailing, an acknowledgment or a stated agency action. The catalog label alone does not establish what followed.
What would support a later status?
A later acknowledgment, response or decision must be matched to this same matter and identifier. Its own date, issuer and wording—not this archive row—determine what it records. No later outcome is established by this reading aid.
Follow the source-verification example · Separate a record from a finding
16. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services — Office for Civil Rights (receipt 675301)
- Date shown in the existing appendix
- 2026-03-28
- Recorded proof-class label
- Portal email
- Excerpt recorded in the appendix
- “Receipt Number: 675301.”
- Recorded tracking number
- Not recorded in this appendix row
Read and cite the linked artifact
What can this record answer?
Compare the source with the date, identifier and excerpt above. Identify whether the actual passage records correspondence, a mailing, an acknowledgment or a stated agency action. The catalog label alone does not establish what followed.
What would support a later status?
A later acknowledgment, response or decision must be matched to this same matter and identifier. Its own date, issuer and wording—not this archive row—determine what it records. No later outcome is established by this reading aid.
Follow the source-verification example · Separate a record from a finding
17. U.S. Office of Special Counsel (filing DI-12112024134)
- Date shown in the existing appendix
- 2024-12-11
- Recorded proof-class label
- Portal email
- Excerpt recorded in the appendix
- “Please find attached a PDF documenting the details of your filing with the Office of Special Counsel.”
- Recorded tracking number
- Not recorded in this appendix row
Read and cite the linked artifact
What can this record answer?
Compare the source with the date, identifier and excerpt above. Identify whether the actual passage records correspondence, a mailing, an acknowledgment or a stated agency action. The catalog label alone does not establish what followed.
What would support a later status?
A later acknowledgment, response or decision must be matched to this same matter and identifier. Its own date, issuer and wording—not this archive row—determine what it records. No later outcome is established by this reading aid.
Follow the source-verification example · Separate a record from a finding
18. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services — Office for Civil Rights (OCR CU-26-656216)
- Date shown in the existing appendix
- Dates shown in the four linked source PDFs
- Recorded proof-class label
- PDF letter; portal email
- Excerpt recorded in the appendix
- “Closure Letter”; “Formal Referral re OCR Transaction CU-26-656216”; “Submission complete”; “complaint submitted to Office for Civil Rights”
- Recorded tracking number
- Not recorded in this appendix row
Read and cite the linked artifacts
What can this record answer?
Compare the source with the date, identifier and excerpt above. Identify whether the actual passage records correspondence, a mailing, an acknowledgment or a stated agency action. The catalog label alone does not establish what followed.
What would support a later status?
A later acknowledgment, response or decision must be matched to this same matter and identifier. Its own date, issuer and wording—not this archive row—determine what it records. No later outcome is established by this reading aid.
Follow the source-verification example · Separate a record from a finding
19. U.S. Department of State (MuckRock 176100 / FOIA 25-00044-F)
- Date shown in the existing appendix
- 2024-11-08
- Recorded proof-class label
- Portal email
- Excerpt recorded in the appendix
- “This request seeks access to the Connecticut Medicaid ABI Waiver Program provider registry.”
- Recorded tracking number
- Not recorded in this appendix row
Read and cite the linked artifact
What can this record answer?
Compare the source with the date, identifier and excerpt above. Identify whether the actual passage records correspondence, a mailing, an acknowledgment or a stated agency action. The catalog label alone does not establish what followed.
What would support a later status?
A later acknowledgment, response or decision must be matched to this same matter and identifier. Its own date, issuer and wording—not this archive row—determine what it records. No later outcome is established by this reading aid.
Follow the source-verification example · Separate a record from a finding
Existing source artifacts
Tracking is left blank when the linked artifact does not visibly show a tracking number.
Verify the filings next
Sent is not received. MSOD received is not the President reading the report. Received is not a finding.
| Addressee | Date shown | Artifact URL | Proof class | Visible text | Tracking number |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joe Biden — President of the United States, The White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW | Sent 2024-09-25 | USPS certified receipt photo = sent SHA-256: 9697c4b70e8552b478ac35785bc4cb215e5b8bf0215dcb78cc37572e7fe6ef25
| sent; mail-room received | RECEIVED / MSOD Mail Operation | 9589 0710 5270 1745 7374 94 |
| Kamala Harris — Vice President of the United States, The White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW | Sent 2024-09-25 | USPS certified receipt photo = sent SHA-256: 1e91410829a03c01bdbc4bf79519264eb03b8b0731f8ebb7f96b22fe73f700b9
| sent; mail-room received | RECEIVED / MSOD Mail Operation | 9589 0710 5270 1745 7374 87 |
| Ned Lamont — Governor of Connecticut | 2023-11-28 | Preserved correspondence PDF | PDF letter | “Dear Governor Lamont,” | |
| Richard Blumenthal — U.S. Senator | 2023-11-28 | Preserved correspondence PDF | PDF letter | “Dear Senator Blumenthal,” | |
| Chris Murphy — U.S. Senator | 2023-11-28 | Preserved correspondence PDF | PDF letter | “Dear Senator Murphy,” | |
| John B. Larson — U.S. Representative | 2023-11-28 | Preserved correspondence PDF | PDF letter | “Dear Congressman Larson,” | |
| Joe Courtney — U.S. Representative | 2023-11-28 | Preserved correspondence PDF | PDF letter | “Dear Congressman Courtney,” | |
| Rosa DeLauro — U.S. Representative | 2023-11-28 | Preserved correspondence PDF | PDF letter | “Dear Congresswoman DeLauro,” | |
| Jim Himes — U.S. Representative | 2023-11-28 | Preserved correspondence PDF | PDF letter | “Dear Congressman Himes,” | |
| Jahana Hayes — U.S. Representative | 2023-11-28 | Preserved correspondence PDF | PDF letter | “Dear Congresswoman Hayes,” | |
| U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions | 2024-09-21 report; 2024-09-30 delivery card | Published certified-mail photograph | USPS photo; signed green card; tracking number | “U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP)” | 9590 9402 6262 0274 8430 42 |
| U.S. Department of Justice — Civil Rights Division (record 489456-MCB) | 2024-08-05 | Published submission email image | Portal email | “Thank you for submitting a report to the Civil Rights Division.” | |
| U.S. Department of Justice — Civil Rights Division (record 533252-GXC) | 2024-11-09 | Published submission email image | Portal email | “Your record number is: 533252-GXC.” | |
| U.S. Department of Justice — Civil Rights Division (record 548805-RXF) | 2024-12-19 | Published submission email image | Portal email | “Your record number is: 548805-RXF.” | |
| U.S. Department of Justice — Civil Rights Division (record 748277-JPJ) | 2026-03-28 | Published submission confirmation PDF | Portal email | “Report successfully submitted.” | |
| U.S. Department of Health and Human Services — Office for Civil Rights (receipt 675301) | 2026-03-28 | Published complaint receipt PDF | Portal email | “Receipt Number: 675301.” | |
| U.S. Office of Special Counsel (filing DI-12112024134) | 2024-12-11 | Published filing email PDF | Portal email | “Please find attached a PDF documenting the details of your filing with the Office of Special Counsel.” | |
| U.S. Department of Health and Human Services — Office for Civil Rights (OCR CU-26-656216) | Dates shown in the four linked source PDFs | Closure letter PDF SHA-256: 7af8076b8943e0c6649492be9abef339ea4d7706aaaf732963de5167d6243820
| PDF letter; portal email | “Closure Letter”; “Formal Referral re OCR Transaction CU-26-656216”; “Submission complete”; “complaint submitted to Office for Civil Rights” | |
| U.S. Department of State (MuckRock 176100 / FOIA 25-00044-F) | 2024-11-08 | Published MuckRock request record | Portal email | “This request seeks access to the Connecticut Medicaid ABI Waiver Program provider registry.” |
Referenced IDs not promoted into proof rows
These identifiers appear elsewhere in the public archive, but the required direct public source artifact was not located locally for this appendix.
- DI-12192024714 — A public catalog entry names the filing, but no direct local public PDF or media receipt file was located for this appendix.
- MA-26-000331 — A published social-media screenshot names the file, but it is not the underlying portal email or receipt.
- 781629-FSX — The existing Livewire article names the DOJ record, but no direct local public receipt file was located.
What a receipt can establish
- 1. What this is
- Mailing and tracking material associated with archive filings.
- 2. What you can check here
- Match the receipt, tracking identifier and documented item before describing a mailing or delivery.
- 3. What it does not establish
- Delivery does not prove the contents were accepted, investigated or acted upon.
- 4. What to check next
- Keep delivery evidence separate from findings. Return to the specific source before citing a factual claim.
Cite this page or follow a related question
This citation identifies the archive page, not a primary document or official finding. Also cite the particular source used for a factual claim.
Copy using your device’s selection controls and enter your actual access date. No publication or revision date is inferred here. How to cite the original source.