ev-000324.png

« David Medeiros & Q 3,728 posts '&) David Medeiros €& @DavidVedeiros - Jan 28 (I eee TO: Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities (CHRO) Attn: Investigator Jo Keogh and Legal Division 450 Columbus Boulevard, Suite 2 Hartford, CT 06103 Email: CHRO.Intake@ct.gov TO: State of Connecticut, Department of Consumer Protection (DCP) Attn: Commissioner and Legal Director Paulette Annon 450 Columbus Boulevard, Suite 901 Hartford, CT 06103 Email: paulette.g.annon@ct.gov AND TO: Office of the Attorney General Attn: AAG Rebecca Quinn 165 Capitol Avenue Hartford, CT 06106 Email: Rebecca.Quinn@ct.gov CC: U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division (Disability Rights Section) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights (OCR) U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC) RE: FORMAL REJECTION OF FINAL FINDING IN CASE NO. 2510183 (MEDEIROS V. DCP); DEMAND FOR IMMEDIATE VACATUR FOR ADMINISTRATIVE FRAUD; AND NOTICE OF MANDATORY FEDERAL SELF- REPORTING OBLIGATIONS Date: January 28, 2026 I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT: THE PROCEEDING IS VOID AB INITIO DUE TO MATERIAL FALSITY The Final Finding of No Reasonable Cause issued on January 22, 2026, is legally void ab initio because it is predicated on a demonstrable falsehood regarding the administrative record. Specifically, the Investigator certified: "No comments were received, thus no changes were made to the draft finding." The Record Proves Administrative Fraud: Submission: On December 29, 2025, at 3:34 PM EST, | served a "Formal Rebuttal to Draft Findings" via email to Investigator Keogh, AAG Quinn, and Assistant Legal Director Annon. The delivery receipt confirms this message was "Relayed" and delivery was "complete". Acknowledgment: On January 5, 2026, at 10:18 AM EST, Investigator Keogh explicitly acknowledged receipt of this rebuttal via email, stating: "Received, thank you." The issuance of a Final Finding claiming "no comments were received" seventeen days after acknowledging receipt of those comments constitutes a deliberate suppression of evidence and a material breach of due process under the Fourteenth Amendment and the Connecticut