The Connecticut Medicaid Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver program, designed to provide crucial support for survivors, has been systematically exploited. This article delves into the intricate web of fraud and mismanagement that has diverted funds and denied essential care to those who need it most. David Medeiros, founder of ABI Resources, recounts the initial discovery of these egregious practices, the immense pressure faced by whistleblowers, and the unwavering commitment to expose the truth. This systemic corruption not only impacts individual survivors but undermines the integrity of public health services. We detail the mechanisms of the fraud, from inflated billing to inadequate service provision, and the devastating human cost. Our fight began locally, but the implications are national, highlighting the vulnerability of such programs to exploitation without vigilant oversight.
Archive Article: Unmasking CT Medicaid ABI Waiver Records
Video explainer: A whistleblower's account of waiver-program concerns
This explainer examines the source record: This article introduces the author's account of alleged fraud and mismanagement in Connecticut's Acquired Brain Injury Waiver program.
Press Play to load the video. Once loaded, you can move to any point. The original MP4 link remains available below.
A filing is not a finding. Read the original source before drawing conclusions.
Download video · English captions (VTT) · Transcript text
Read the complete transcript
This article introduces the author's account of alleged fraud and mismanagement in Connecticut's Acquired Brain Injury Waiver program.
The page describes a program intended to provide support for brain injury survivors. The author connects its administration with the daily experience of receiving care.
The short text mentions inflated billing, inadequate services, and pressure on whistleblowers. It does not include the detailed records for each allegation.
The article argues that diverted resources can affect people who rely on services. Its specific claims need to be traced to the underlying documents.
Open the article and follow the related archive material. Match a particular billing or service claim with its dated original record.
The page states the author's concerns and purpose. It does not itself establish nationwide fraud or a legal finding. A filing is not a finding.
Related evidence references
Dataset provenance
Administrative Burden Livewire Index
Browse the complete dataset →Topic details
Cite this archive article
This citation identifies this article—not an original filing, an agency finding or a court decision. For a factual claim, also identify and check the particular source linked in the article.
Select the text and copy it using your device’s copy command. Replace the access-date placeholder with the date you actually read the page. The publication date is the article’s recorded date, not a new verification or revision date.