1
00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:01,003
Question 83.

2
00:00:01,003 --> 00:00:04,213
Were any restrictions based
on a specific assessed

3
00:00:04,213 --> 00:00:07,424
need, less-intrusive attempts,
informed consent, time limits, and...?

4
00:00:07,424 --> 00:00:10,634
The 2023 report raises
a concern, not a

5
00:00:10,634 --> 00:00:11,036
finding.

6
00:00:11,036 --> 00:00:11,838
People served:

7
00:00:11,838 --> 00:00:15,049
HCBS protections address integrated
settings, privacy, dignity, autonomy,

8
00:00:15,049 --> 00:00:17,858
visitors, tenancy safeguards,
and freedom from coercion.

9
00:00:17,858 --> 00:00:18,661
David Medeiros:

10
00:00:18,661 --> 00:00:21,871
Helping a person resist coercion
may receive anti-retaliation

11
00:00:21,871 --> 00:00:23,878
protection under covered
disability-rights rules.

12
00:00:23,878 --> 00:00:24,680
ABI Resources:

13
00:00:24,680 --> 00:00:27,891
ABI may aid protected
rights, but actor coverage,

14
00:00:27,891 --> 00:00:31,102
state action, standing, and
remedy must be separately

15
00:00:31,102 --> 00:00:31,503
established.

16
00:00:31,503 --> 00:00:33,509
Constitutional claims
need state action;

17
00:00:33,509 --> 00:00:36,720
beneficiary choice does not
guarantee ABI referrals or

18
00:00:36,720 --> 00:00:37,523
a contract.

19
00:00:37,523 --> 00:00:40,332
Classify the issue
before choosing a remedy.

20
00:00:40,332 --> 00:00:43,141
Preserve leases, ownership, notices,
choice documents, restrictions,

21
00:00:43,141 --> 00:00:45,549
service changes, complaints,
and provider-change outcomes.

22
00:00:45,549 --> 00:00:48,358
Apply Constitution, statute,
regulation, contract, then record.