1
00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:01,030
Question 66.

2
00:00:01,030 --> 00:00:04,352
What exact “financial incentive”
was allegedly offered to

3
00:00:04,352 --> 00:00:04,767
consumers?

4
00:00:04,767 --> 00:00:08,088
The 2023 report raises
a concern, not a

5
00:00:08,088 --> 00:00:08,503
finding.

6
00:00:08,503 --> 00:00:09,334
People served:

7
00:00:09,334 --> 00:00:12,655
People served retain informed choice,
necessary services, accessible

8
00:00:12,655 --> 00:00:15,146
process, and protection from
coercive administration.

9
00:00:15,146 --> 00:00:15,976
David Medeiros:

10
00:00:15,976 --> 00:00:19,298
Fraud-related reporting can trigger
specific statutes, but lawful

11
00:00:19,298 --> 00:00:22,619
protected activity, knowledge,
causation, and timing must be

12
00:00:22,619 --> 00:00:23,034
shown.

13
00:00:23,034 --> 00:00:23,865
ABI Resources:

14
00:00:23,865 --> 00:00:27,186
ABI may have payment, audit,
contract, or retaliation

15
00:00:27,186 --> 00:00:27,601
interests;

16
00:00:27,601 --> 00:00:30,922
financial loss alone is
not a constitutional claim.

17
00:00:30,922 --> 00:00:32,998
Constitutional claims
need state action;

18
00:00:32,998 --> 00:00:36,320
beneficiary choice does not
guarantee ABI referrals or

19
00:00:36,320 --> 00:00:37,150
a contract.

20
00:00:37,150 --> 00:00:40,056
Classify the issue
before choosing a remedy.

21
00:00:40,056 --> 00:00:42,547
Preserve transactions, contracts,
claims, benefits, authorizations,

22
00:00:42,547 --> 00:00:45,453
medical necessity, recipients,
timing, and funding sources.

23
00:00:45,453 --> 00:00:48,359
Apply Constitution, statute,
regulation, contract, then record.