1
00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:00,979
Question 54.

2
00:00:00,979 --> 00:00:04,093
Did anyone track whether recommended
transitions benefited the

3
00:00:04,093 --> 00:00:07,207
participant, a provider, a
contractor, or the program...?

4
00:00:07,207 --> 00:00:10,321
The 2023 report raises
a concern, not a

5
00:00:10,321 --> 00:00:10,710
finding.

6
00:00:10,710 --> 00:00:11,489
People served:

7
00:00:11,489 --> 00:00:14,603
A covered service decision
may require informed choice,

8
00:00:14,603 --> 00:00:17,717
conflict safeguards, accessible
notice, and a fair hearing.

9
00:00:17,717 --> 00:00:18,496
David Medeiros:

10
00:00:18,496 --> 00:00:21,610
Questioning authority or transitions
may be protected advocacy,

11
00:00:21,610 --> 00:00:24,335
but government action and
causation remain essential.

12
00:00:24,335 --> 00:00:25,114
ABI Resources:

13
00:00:25,114 --> 00:00:28,228
ABI may enforce actual
contracts or process rights;

14
00:00:28,228 --> 00:00:31,342
it has no presumed
property right in referrals

15
00:00:31,342 --> 00:00:32,510
or waiver placement.

16
00:00:32,510 --> 00:00:34,456
Constitutional claims
need state action;

17
00:00:34,456 --> 00:00:37,570
beneficiary choice does not
guarantee ABI referrals or

18
00:00:37,570 --> 00:00:38,349
a contract.

19
00:00:38,349 --> 00:00:41,074
Classify the issue
before choosing a remedy.

20
00:00:41,074 --> 00:00:43,410
Preserve waiver terms, amendments,
authorizations, assessments,

21
00:00:43,410 --> 00:00:46,135
consultation notes, billing
codes, notices, and appeals.

22
00:00:46,135 --> 00:00:48,860
Apply Constitution, statute,
regulation, contract, then record.
