WEBVTT

00:00:00.200 --> 00:00:00.975
Question 51.

00:00:00.975 --> 00:00:04.077
If an exception to
conflict rules existed, was

00:00:04.077 --> 00:00:07.179
it documented, approved, and paired
with accessible safeguards...?

00:00:07.179 --> 00:00:10.281
The 2023 report raises
a concern, not a

00:00:10.281 --> 00:00:10.669
finding.

00:00:10.669 --> 00:00:11.444
People served:

00:00:11.444 --> 00:00:14.546
A covered service decision
may require informed choice,

00:00:14.546 --> 00:00:17.648
conflict safeguards, accessible
notice, and a fair hearing.

00:00:17.648 --> 00:00:18.424
David Medeiros:

00:00:18.424 --> 00:00:21.526
Questioning authority or transitions
may be protected advocacy,

00:00:21.526 --> 00:00:24.240
but government action and
causation remain essential.

00:00:24.240 --> 00:00:25.015
ABI Resources:

00:00:25.015 --> 00:00:28.117
ABI may enforce actual
contracts or process rights;

00:00:28.117 --> 00:00:31.219
it has no presumed
property right in referrals

00:00:31.219 --> 00:00:32.382
or waiver placement.

00:00:32.382 --> 00:00:34.321
Constitutional claims
need state action;

00:00:34.321 --> 00:00:37.423
beneficiary choice does not
guarantee ABI referrals or

00:00:37.423 --> 00:00:38.198
a contract.

00:00:38.198 --> 00:00:40.912
Classify the issue
before choosing a remedy.

00:00:40.912 --> 00:00:43.239
Preserve waiver terms, amendments,
authorizations, assessments,

00:00:43.239 --> 00:00:45.953
consultation notes, billing
codes, notices, and appeals.

00:00:45.953 --> 00:00:48.667
Apply Constitution, statute,
regulation, contract, then record.
