WEBVTT

00:00:00.200 --> 00:00:00.998
Question 18.

00:00:00.998 --> 00:00:04.191
Did referral patterns change
after ABI Resources complained,

00:00:04.191 --> 00:00:07.383
and if so, what independent
explanation and records...?

00:00:07.383 --> 00:00:10.576
The 2023 report raises
a concern, not a

00:00:10.576 --> 00:00:10.975
finding.

00:00:10.975 --> 00:00:11.773
People served:

00:00:11.773 --> 00:00:14.168
A beneficiary may have
informed-choice, accessible-notice,

00:00:14.168 --> 00:00:16.961
hearing, and qualified-provider
protections, subject to program

00:00:16.961 --> 00:00:17.360
limits.

00:00:17.360 --> 00:00:18.158
David Medeiros:

00:00:18.158 --> 00:00:21.351
Reporting possible steering
can be protected speech or

00:00:21.351 --> 00:00:24.544
statutory activity only if
each required element is

00:00:24.544 --> 00:00:24.943
proved.

00:00:24.943 --> 00:00:25.741
ABI Resources:

00:00:25.741 --> 00:00:28.933
Beneficiary choice does not
give ABI a constitutional

00:00:28.933 --> 00:00:32.126
right to referrals,
volume, renewal, or a state

00:00:32.126 --> 00:00:32.525
contract.

00:00:32.525 --> 00:00:34.520
Constitutional claims
need state action;

00:00:34.520 --> 00:00:37.713
beneficiary choice does not
guarantee ABI referrals or

00:00:37.713 --> 00:00:38.511
a contract.

00:00:38.511 --> 00:00:41.305
Classify the issue
before choosing a remedy.

00:00:41.305 --> 00:00:44.497
Preserve the full referral
ledger, provider options shown,

00:00:44.497 --> 00:00:46.493
reasons, dates,
decision-makers, and outcomes.

00:00:46.493 --> 00:00:49.286
Apply Constitution, statute,
regulation, contract, then record.
