1
00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:00,998
Question 18.

2
00:00:00,998 --> 00:00:04,191
Did referral patterns change
after ABI Resources complained,

3
00:00:04,191 --> 00:00:07,383
and if so, what independent
explanation and records...?

4
00:00:07,383 --> 00:00:10,576
The 2023 report raises
a concern, not a

5
00:00:10,576 --> 00:00:10,975
finding.

6
00:00:10,975 --> 00:00:11,773
People served:

7
00:00:11,773 --> 00:00:14,168
A beneficiary may have
informed-choice, accessible-notice,

8
00:00:14,168 --> 00:00:16,961
hearing, and qualified-provider
protections, subject to program

9
00:00:16,961 --> 00:00:17,360
limits.

10
00:00:17,360 --> 00:00:18,158
David Medeiros:

11
00:00:18,158 --> 00:00:21,351
Reporting possible steering
can be protected speech or

12
00:00:21,351 --> 00:00:24,544
statutory activity only if
each required element is

13
00:00:24,544 --> 00:00:24,943
proved.

14
00:00:24,943 --> 00:00:25,741
ABI Resources:

15
00:00:25,741 --> 00:00:28,933
Beneficiary choice does not
give ABI a constitutional

16
00:00:28,933 --> 00:00:32,126
right to referrals,
volume, renewal, or a state

17
00:00:32,126 --> 00:00:32,525
contract.

18
00:00:32,525 --> 00:00:34,520
Constitutional claims
need state action;

19
00:00:34,520 --> 00:00:37,713
beneficiary choice does not
guarantee ABI referrals or

20
00:00:37,713 --> 00:00:38,511
a contract.

21
00:00:38,511 --> 00:00:41,305
Classify the issue
before choosing a remedy.

22
00:00:41,305 --> 00:00:44,497
Preserve the full referral
ledger, provider options shown,

23
00:00:44,497 --> 00:00:46,493
reasons, dates,
decision-makers, and outcomes.

24
00:00:46,493 --> 00:00:49,286
Apply Constitution, statute,
regulation, contract, then record.
