1
00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:00,990
Question 14.

2
00:00:00,990 --> 00:00:04,148
In what order were providers
shown or recommended,

3
00:00:04,148 --> 00:00:06,912
and did the order
itself steer decisions?

4
00:00:06,912 --> 00:00:10,070
The 2023 report raises
a concern, not a

5
00:00:10,070 --> 00:00:10,465
finding.

6
00:00:10,465 --> 00:00:11,255
People served:

7
00:00:11,255 --> 00:00:13,623
A beneficiary may have
informed-choice, accessible-notice,

8
00:00:13,623 --> 00:00:16,387
hearing, and qualified-provider
protections, subject to program

9
00:00:16,387 --> 00:00:16,782
limits.

10
00:00:16,782 --> 00:00:17,572
David Medeiros:

11
00:00:17,572 --> 00:00:20,730
Reporting possible steering
can be protected speech or

12
00:00:20,730 --> 00:00:23,888
statutory activity only if
each required element is

13
00:00:23,888 --> 00:00:24,283
proved.

14
00:00:24,283 --> 00:00:25,073
ABI Resources:

15
00:00:25,073 --> 00:00:28,231
Beneficiary choice does not
give ABI a constitutional

16
00:00:28,231 --> 00:00:31,390
right to referrals,
volume, renewal, or a state

17
00:00:31,390 --> 00:00:31,785
contract.

18
00:00:31,785 --> 00:00:33,759
Constitutional claims
need state action;

19
00:00:33,759 --> 00:00:36,917
beneficiary choice does not
guarantee ABI referrals or

20
00:00:36,917 --> 00:00:37,707
a contract.

21
00:00:37,707 --> 00:00:40,470
Classify the issue
before choosing a remedy.

22
00:00:40,470 --> 00:00:43,629
Preserve the full referral
ledger, provider options shown,

23
00:00:43,629 --> 00:00:45,603
reasons, dates,
decision-makers, and outcomes.

24
00:00:45,603 --> 00:00:48,366
Apply Constitution, statute,
regulation, contract, then record.
