WEBVTT

00:00:00.200 --> 00:00:03.323
The report raised a grave question:

00:00:03.323 --> 00:00:06.966
were housing arrangements
tying disabled residents to

00:00:06.966 --> 00:00:10.610
particular service providers
through fear of losing

00:00:10.610 --> 00:00:13.212
a home, belongings, or roommates?

00:00:13.212 --> 00:00:16.856
HCBS rules protect privacy,
dignity, autonomy, freedom

00:00:16.856 --> 00:00:20.499
from coercion, provider
choice, and tenancy safeguards

00:00:20.499 --> 00:00:22.061
in provider-controlled settings.

00:00:22.061 --> 00:00:25.704
Disability law also protects
community integration and

00:00:25.704 --> 00:00:28.307
addresses serious risk
of institutionalization.

00:00:28.307 --> 00:00:30.909
Those are the resident's rights.

00:00:30.909 --> 00:00:34.553
Medeiros and ABI
Resources may lawfully aid

00:00:34.553 --> 00:00:36.635
or encourage their exercise;

00:00:36.635 --> 00:00:40.278
retaliation protections
can apply when the elements

00:00:40.278 --> 00:00:40.799
fit.

00:00:40.799 --> 00:00:44.442
The counterpoint is that
integrated housing and

00:00:44.442 --> 00:00:47.565
services can be lawful and beneficial.

00:00:47.565 --> 00:00:50.168
The proof is not suspicion.

00:00:50.168 --> 00:00:53.811
It is leases, ownership,
eviction terms, provider-change

00:00:53.811 --> 00:00:57.455
outcomes, complaints, informed
consent, and individualized plan

00:00:57.455 --> 00:00:57.975
records.