1
00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:03,323
The report raised a grave question:

2
00:00:03,323 --> 00:00:06,966
were housing arrangements
tying disabled residents to

3
00:00:06,966 --> 00:00:10,610
particular service providers
through fear of losing

4
00:00:10,610 --> 00:00:13,212
a home, belongings, or roommates?

5
00:00:13,212 --> 00:00:16,856
HCBS rules protect privacy,
dignity, autonomy, freedom

6
00:00:16,856 --> 00:00:20,499
from coercion, provider
choice, and tenancy safeguards

7
00:00:20,499 --> 00:00:22,061
in provider-controlled settings.

8
00:00:22,061 --> 00:00:25,704
Disability law also protects
community integration and

9
00:00:25,704 --> 00:00:28,307
addresses serious risk
of institutionalization.

10
00:00:28,307 --> 00:00:30,909
Those are the resident's rights.

11
00:00:30,909 --> 00:00:34,553
Medeiros and ABI
Resources may lawfully aid

12
00:00:34,553 --> 00:00:36,635
or encourage their exercise;

13
00:00:36,635 --> 00:00:40,278
retaliation protections
can apply when the elements

14
00:00:40,278 --> 00:00:40,799
fit.

15
00:00:40,799 --> 00:00:44,442
The counterpoint is that
integrated housing and

16
00:00:44,442 --> 00:00:47,565
services can be lawful and beneficial.

17
00:00:47,565 --> 00:00:50,168
The proof is not suspicion.

18
00:00:50,168 --> 00:00:53,811
It is leases, ownership,
eviction terms, provider-change

19
00:00:53,811 --> 00:00:57,455
outcomes, complaints, informed
consent, and individualized plan

20
00:00:57,455 --> 00:00:57,975
records.