The reviewed source set proves 5,133 binder pages, 59 structured events, and 272 unique archive records.

Publish the larger total only with an export, deduplication rule, measurement date, and hash manifest.


146 FOIA records plus about 170 MuckRock requests

The current audit does not include a complete native FOIA register supporting those totals.

Build a request level register with agency, date, identifier, disposition, appeal, and native source.


335 chronology events and 32 federal investigations

The reviewed timeline contains 59 predefined events. A complaint, referral, or website status is not an investigation.

Separate submissions, acknowledgments, referrals, closures, open matters, and confirmed investigations.


Tens of thousands of hashed public files and pages

The improvement brief states several changing totals without a dated crawl manifest.

Attach a dated file inventory, sitemap count, duplicate rule, hash ledger, and public versus protected count.


Evidence was destroyed or intentionally deleted

Deletion or unread notices can prove a message status but do not alone establish intent, legal spoliation, or destruction of all agency records.

Preserve native message headers, server logs, retention policy, custodians, and any official finding. Use deleted without being read when that exact receipt supports it.


Some acknowledgments, productions, closures, referrals, or requests for information appear in the record.

Describe the specific office, submission, response received, unresolved remedy, and measurement date.


Provider directory concealment violated federal law

Federal freedom of choice authorities are relevant, but a violation requires facts, applicable exceptions, and legal determination.

State the observed access problem, cite the controlling record and law, and use raises a compliance question unless adjudicated.


Political connections caused steering or financial favoritism

Roles, affiliations, funding, referrals, and timing must be proved separately before any connection is drawn.

Use a conflict screening matrix and ask for independent review. Do not state corruption, cartel, kickback, or scheme as fact without findings.


The 2025 financial loss was retaliation or financial sabotage

The loss, transaction record, support case, bank response, and reports can be documented; motive requires separate proof.

Describe the transaction event and escalation record. Do not link it causally to advocacy without evidence.


A hearing speaker intentionally silenced testimony

Needs the official time code and full context

Written testimony is verified; this audit has not located a controlling live segment showing the full exchange.

Add the CT N time code and transcript before describing the event; distinguish written filing from live testimony.


The archive is indestructible or impossible to erase

A hash detects change only when a trusted comparison copy and original hash are retained. Availability also depends on backups, domains, hosting, and access controls.

Use integrity checked, redundantly preserved, or designed for durable public access after verifying backup and recovery controls.


Named people committed crimes or constitutional violations

Not established by titles or submissions

Public archive titles prove publication, not guilt or liability.

Use named roles only to document notice or jurisdiction. Reserve criminal and liability conclusions for official findings or judgments.


Government Response and Disposition Ledger

Government response and disposition ledger

Provider directories, referrals, service plans, care management, authorization codes, billing, housing, waiver administration, FOIA, and ADA communication.

Letters, grievances, public records requests, commissioner notice, support tickets, and legislative filings.

The route documents notice or contact; it does not by itself establish jurisdiction, agreement, investigation, finding, or remedy.


Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities

Disability discrimination, accommodation, retaliation, case delay, communication, and record preservation.

Cases 2410220, 2510183, 2510184; status requests; accommodation requests; fact finding preparation.


Conduct at a public brain injury forum and denial of a requested recording accommodation.

Complaint, CHRO process, witness and response records.


Systemic ABI Waiver concerns, CHRO handling, retaliation concerns, and requests for executive intervention.

Letters dated in late 2023 and later notices; receipt proof should control.


Constructive notice, civil rights concerns, public records, and requests for state legal review.

Letters, FOIA responses, and copied complaint communications.


Whistleblower disclosure, referral handling, ABI Waiver oversight, and later records requests.

RWB 1946 references, grievance notices, and October 2025 FOIA request and response.


Records access, appeal routes, digital delivery, and disability related access to the public records process.

FOIA communications and later acknowledgment record.


Program administration, contracts, budgets, and oversight questions.

Public records requests and copied grievance notices.


Medical, provider, and public health oversight records.

Public records requests and accommodation language.


Worker pay, qualifications, and labor compliance connected to Medicaid funded services.


Department of Economic and Community Development

Public funding, business impact, and related state records.


Federal and state fund flows and public accountability questions.

Notice letters and public records requests.


Conflict of interest and related party transparency questions.

Public records requests and archive analysis.


Program oversight, public testimony, protection of FOIA, ADA, civil rights, and whistleblower processes.

2024 filed grievance; 2025 written testimony; committee hearing record.


Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection

Records concerning ABI Resources, state police contacts, and preservation.

Expedited records demand and acknowledgment described in the archive.


July 4, 2025 incident, complaint review, body camera, CAD, system logs, fees, redactions, and disability access.

Complaint, follow ups, multiple FOIA requests, fee waiver requests, video delivery, and response letters.


President Joseph R. Biden Jr., United States

September 2024 report recipient. The submission route is identified; receipt should be proven from the native record.

Named distribution or contact is not converted into receipt, review, investigation, finding, or remedy without the corresponding source.


Vice President Kamala D. Harris, United States


Medicaid administration, civil rights, public records, and federal funding notice.


Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

Administrator Chiquita Brooks LaSure, United States

Waiver oversight, provider choice, records, NPI issues, referrals, and state compliance.


Inspector General Christi A. Grimm, United States

Fraud, waste, abuse, Medicaid integrity, and later financial referrals.


Assistant Attorney General Kristen M. Clarke, United States

ADA, Section 504, civil rights, retaliation, and a long intake and closure record.


Director Melanie Fontes Rainer, United States

Disability access, effective communication, Section 504, and health program discrimination.


Wage and hour issues connected to Medicaid funded work.


Comptroller General Gene L. Dodaro, United States

Audit and federal program oversight requests.


Chair Charlotte A. Burrows, United States

Employment discrimination route named in the 2024 report.


United States Commission on Civil Rights

National civil rights oversight route named in the 2024 report.


Medicaid and federal funding oversight route named in the 2024 report.


Long term care and Medicaid oversight route named in the 2024 report.


Health, labor, disability, and Medicaid policy route named in the 2024 report.


Tips, evidence packets, cybercrime follow up, and IC3 related communication.


Thirteen sequential disclosures are identified in the November 25, 2024 timeline entry.


Office of Government Information Services

Federal FOIA mediation and records access route.


Archive records a September 2024 intervention after an automated deletion notice involving a records request.


Cybercrime and financial loss referral identified in the 2025 bank fraud record.


Congressional committees and members, United States

March 2026 submissions and system closure records are identified. Delivery proof must be distinguished from committee action.


President Donald J. Trump and Vice President James D. Vance, United States

The 2026 archive identifies submissions and public appeals directed to the administration. Receipt and action remain separate questions.


A current, public, accessible list of qualified and willing providers.

The requested remedy is documented; completion is not claimed without a supporting official record.


Written neutral criteria, auditable referral logs, and meaningful participant choice.


Timely plans, clear responsibilities, correction routes, and aid continuation where applicable.


An accommodation process that works for people with memory, processing, and communication disabilities.


Community based services consistent with freedom of choice and the Olmstead integration mandate.


A reviewable chain from allegation to submission, receipt, response, finding, and remedy.


A record families, investigators, lawmakers, journalists, and the public can locate and audit.


The dated service foundation begins in 1998 and precedes the intensive 2023–2026 escalation record.

It establishes sequence without asserting the merits of later allegations.

Qualified action PSAR-A-001 and source exhibit label EXH-1998-001

Current Public Service and Action Record

The controlled archive contains a dated service-origin entry.

The complete history of every service action since 1998.


The November 21, 2023 grievance consolidated recurring ABI Waiver concerns and proposed specific remedies.

It shows issues and proposed corrections in one dated public record.

A public report and remedy proposal exist.

That every reported concern was adjudicated or proven.


The September 2024 report identified a multi-office federal distribution and oversight route.

It documents escalation beyond Connecticut while keeping receipt and investigation distinct.

The report and named distribution route are public.

Receipt, review, investigation, agreement, finding, or remedy by every addressee.


The March 2026 record presents a national Olmstead and civil-rights submission with related public materials.

It connects community-integration issues to a dated public source.

A public Olmstead and civil-rights report exists.

An official finding on every allegation.


The 5,133-page binder is delivered publicly as 14 continuous, independently hashed page-range files.

It provides a bounded verification path to the preserved record.

All 14 local public parts matched expected byte counts and SHA-256 digests on 2026-08-10.

The published parts match the controlling part manifest and cover pages 1–5,133.

That every statement inside the binder is true, complete, or officially adjudicated.


Adversarial Review and Alternative Explanations

Risk, alternative-explanation, and quarantine register

Several timeline rows say an agency initiated an investigation. A website label or complaint acknowledgment does not prove an investigation.

Change to submitted, acknowledged, referred, or archive asserts until an agency status letter is attached.


Rendered timeline rows describe an HHS exclusion notice, receivership, court audit, and adverse federal findings involving ABI Resources.

Quarantine. These entries appear inconsistent with the main record and require primary orders or should be removed.


The federal report is dated September 21, 2024, while the 75 page binder version carries September 24 footer dates.

Describe as prepared September 21 and distributed or revised by September 24 until sent records resolve the date.


The 2024 report appears in 50 page and 75 page forms.

Identify each version by hash, creation date, purpose, and recipient list.


Some source text applies federal FOIA directly to Connecticut agencies.

Use Connecticut FOIA for Connecticut agencies and 5 U.S.C. section 552 only for federal agencies.


A twenty working day determination rule belongs to federal FOIA. Connecticut records must be provided promptly and Connecticut appeal rules differ.

Do not apply one deadline to every agency.


Some archive titles state crimes, obstruction, spoliation, fraud, or constitutional violations as settled facts.

Use concern, allegation, question, or evidence for review unless an official finding or judgment exists.


The record contains temporal connections among complaints, referrals, business harm, police contact, and financial loss.

Temporal sequence is not proof of a common actor or coordinated plan. State only what the records directly connect.


Archive totals include interface counts, parsed counts, and repeated source copies.

Use 272 unique archive records from this audit, 251 displayed as published, and explain the measurement date.


Roles changed across 2023 through 2026 and some source names may refer to different people with similar names.

Verify the dated role in the native source. Do not infer current employment.


The binder contains contact information, financial material, and potentially protected health information.

Keep the master report internal. Redact the public edition and publish only source controlled exhibits.


Agency receipt, case number, filed testimony, official response, native email, transaction record, court or commission filing.


Sent item, support ticket, read receipt, deletion notice, provider record, bank record, or communication created at the time.


A timeline, article, index, or summary created by David Medeiros that points to evidence but is not itself the underlying proof.


A statement that needs the native document, has inconsistent dates, asserts an investigation without an agency notice, or conflicts with another record.


A submission is described as a submission, not as an investigation.


A receipt proves receipt, not agreement with the allegation.


A closure proves an agency response, not the truth or falsity of the underlying concern.


A public article proves publication, not the accuracy of every statement in the article.


A case number is preserved exactly but must be matched to the original acknowledgment before any higher-consequence claim.


Names document notice, roles, and communication routes; naming never implies liability.


Private medical details, private contact information, and participant information are not reproduced.


Complete means complete for the supplied and verified controlled source corpus, not every lifetime action or every record ever created.


The corpus does not contain a complete 1998–2017 service ledger, every native sent message or acknowledgment, every hearing time code, every participant story, or every official export.


Integrity checks show byte identity against a recorded digest; they do not prove authorship, truth, authenticity, legality, or an official finding.


Eight high-consequence timeline entries are withheld pending primary agency records or orders.


Automated extraction identifiers and binder subjects remain OCR-uncertain until source context is confirmed.


The HTML edition is the primary accessible version. The downloadable PDF and DOCX identify their tested scope and do not claim PDF/UA or complete WCAG certification.


Primary editorial and evidentiary synthesis; claims remain subject to the public controls in this edition.


Earlier working edition; duplicate or superseded where the A+ edition and current public controls are more precise.


Control architecture and publication boundary.


5,133-page evidence binder

Original binder identity reported by the controlling manifest; public delivery uses 14 independently hashed parts.


Public Service and Action Record

Existing qualified public action and claim-review control.


This digest supports byte-identity comparison for this public part; it does not prove the truth of its contents.


Corrections are evaluated against the source, recorded without erasing history, and reflected in a versioned public edition.


Start with the stable record ID and canonical public URL.


Read the visible claim-status label, source basis, and limitation together.


Open the cited source or binder part and compare the relevant passage in context.


Use the SHA-256 digest to test byte identity only; a matching digest does not prove truth, authorship, or legal effect.


Check dates, names, case identifiers, and response status against the cited primary record.


Report any mismatch through the public corrections process before relying on the record.