Skip to main content
David Medeiros
Menu

2026 Major Conflict of Interest Evidence — SafeGuard Services (Peraton UPIC) & Gainwell Technologies Share Exact Same Building While Investigating My Whistleblower Complaint

⚠️ ZERO CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN — CONFLICT REMAINS UNRESOLVED

Key Contact: Project Coordinator

Eric M. Bischof

Project Coordinator

UPIC Northeastern Jurisdiction – Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Contractor

SafeGuard Services LLC

Suite 200, 1250 Camp Hill Bypass, Camp Hill, PA 17011

Phone: (571) 508-2367

Fax: (717) 731-6610

Email: eric.bischof@peraton.com

Applicable Federal Regulations & Legal Framework

This arrangement violates FAR Subpart 9.5 (Organizational Conflicts of Interest), 42 CFR § 455.238 (Contractor independence requirements), and CMS Program Integrity Manual guidelines for independent investigations. The co-location of SafeGuard Services (UPIC Contractor) and Gainwell Technologies at the identical physical address creates an inherent structural conflict that compromises investigative independence and violates federal procurement and Medicaid integrity standards.

Temporal Mapping: Years of Targeting & Co-Location

Gainwell Technologies has targeted ABI Resources for years while operating from the identical physical location as the UPIC contractor investigating my whistleblower complaint (March 25–26, 2026). This pattern demonstrates systematic coordination and conflict of interest spanning multiple years, with both entities maintaining offices at Suite 200, 1250 Camp Hill Bypass, Camp Hill, PA 17011.

Direct Evidence of Conflict of Interest

The following documents and geographic evidence establish a clear, documented conflict of interest between SafeGuard Services (operating as the UPIC contractor for Connecticut DSS) and Gainwell Technologies, both operating from the identical physical location while SafeGuard was investigating my whistleblower complaint.

ZERO CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN

March 25, 2026

March 25, 2026 — SafeGuard Services (Peraton UPIC) Official Response

Official response from SafeGuard Services (Peraton UPIC contractor) acknowledging receipt of whistleblower complaint while operating from the same building as Gainwell Technologies.

PDF
View

ZERO CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN

March 26, 2026

March 26, 2026 — Gainwell Technologies CMAP E-Delivery Alert

Gainwell Technologies system alert confirming their operational presence at the same physical location as SafeGuard Services during the investigation period.

PDF
View

ZERO CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN

March 26, 2026

March 26, 2026 — Public Filing Notice Regarding the Reported SafeGuard and Gainwell Co-Location

Preserved screenshot of a public filing notice describing the reported SafeGuard Services and Gainwell Technologies co-location and identifying the agencies notified. This screenshot documents the public statement; it is not independent verification of the underlying allegation. Review the source records listed above.

Image
View

Conflict of Interest Analysis

Physical Co-Location

SafeGuard Services (UPIC Contractor) and Gainwell Technologies operate from the identical address: Suite 200, 1250 Camp Hill Bypass, Camp Hill, PA 17011. This shared physical location creates an inherent conflict of interest when SafeGuard is tasked with investigating complaints against Gainwell's systems and operations.

Operational Conflict

SafeGuard's role as UPIC contractor requires independent investigation of Medicaid integrity issues. Gainwell Technologies provides critical system infrastructure for Connecticut Medicaid. Shared facilities compromise investigative independence and create appearance of impropriety.

Zero Corrective Action

Despite documented evidence of this conflict of interest, no corrective action has been taken by CMS, Connecticut DSS, or the contractors themselves. The conflict remains unresolved as of March 26, 2026.

Federal Oversight Failure

CMS and HHS-OIG have been notified of this conflict through multiple whistleblower reports and FOIA requests. The failure to address this structural conflict undermines the integrity of Medicaid oversight and whistleblower protections.

Demand Federal Action

This conflict of interest represents a systemic failure in Medicaid oversight. Federal agencies must immediately address this structural conflict and implement corrective measures to protect whistleblowers and ensure program integrity.

Submit Evidence or Report

Published

March 26, 2026

Status

UNRESOLVED CONFLICT

Authority

Public Record Evidence